Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Sorry I have a basic question.
> > Was there any consensus we would introduce nested transactions
> > (or savepoints) in the way currently discussed ?
> 
> I think we are a long way from saying we can or will actually do it.
> Error handling and resource management (eg locks) are a couple of other
> huge cans of worms that have yet to be opened.  But certainly a solid
> design for the transaction logging and tuple validity checking is a
> necessary step.

Is the way to undo data rejected already ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/