RE: Other JDBC Performance Question
| От | Dalphin, Mark |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: Other JDBC Performance Question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3E6E97C525D9D21184190008C7CF685844CF45@silver-exch.amgen.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Other JDBC Performance Question ("Frank Morton" <fmorton@base2inc.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 08:37:33 -0500
> "Frank Morton" <fmorton@base2inc.com> wrote:
>
...
> What I would really like is to somehow force the
> database to be RAM resident, but still access it
> using SQL. I am about to write some code to
> load the whole thing up into RAM and accessing
> it some special way without SQL, but it really
> isn't what I want to do.
>
> Is there any way to force the database to be RAM
> resident? Either with this package or something
> else?
>
I don't know of a good way to speed up Postgresql access, but if the DB is
really so small, why not "speed up the hardware" and use a RAM disk? I don't
know about other UNIXs, but I believe Linux allows you to create a RAM disk
(I know it does at boot time; I haven't looked into using one at run time).
Mark (mdalphin@amgen.com)
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: