Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems
> rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would
> swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.

I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
guesstimate. Can you provide some context?

Joe