Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Luke Lonergan
Тема Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Дата
Msg-id 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D01995FD4@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
Dave,


From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dave Cramer
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:15 AM
To: Luke Lonergan
Cc: Adam Weisberg; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

Luke,

Have you tried the areca cards, they are slightly faster yet. 
No, I've been curious since I read an earlier posting here.  I've had a lot more experience with the 3Ware cards, mostly good, and they've been doing a lot of volume with Rackable/Yahoo which gives me some more confidence.
 
The new 3Ware 9550SX cards use a PowerPC for checksumming, so their write performance is now up to par with the best cards I believe.  We find that you still need to set Linux readahead to at least 8MB (blockdev --setra) to get maximum read performance on them, is that your experience with the Arecas?  We get about 260MB/s read on 8 drives in RAID5 without the readahead tuning and about 400MB/s with it.
 
- Luke

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Следующее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (