Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :)
>
>We're actually working on adding a new server online that is offshore,
>which will also give us another subnet to work off of ... but having a
>third-party secondary server wouldn't hurt, you are right ...
>
OK, add 64.46.156.80 as a slave to your master, and NSC.INSPECTHOUSE.COM
will provide DNS services.
>
>On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 greg@turnstep.com wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>Speaking of DNS, we should probably not put all of our eggs
>>in one basket (subnet):
>>
>>$ whois postgresql.org
>>
>>
>>>...
>>> Domain servers in listed order:
>>>
>>> NS.HUB.ORG 64.49.215.5
>>> NS2.HUB.ORG 64.49.215.6
>>>
>>>
>>It would be nice if one or more nameservers were added that
>>were not in the same subnet, especially because we have so
>>many mirrors (subdomains) that are scattered all over the globe.
>>
>>Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
>>PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200301051008
>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
>>
>>iD8DBQE+GE5lvJuQZxSWSsgRAteAAJ9YQF/eOpS+bZl84HOT84HAiaRQtQCfawbI
>>VpEZSB8oXoO3ycza4g6h5Hg=
>>=19gB
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
>