Tom Lane wrote:
>
> inoue@postgresql.org (Hiroshi Inoue) writes:
> > src/bin/pg_dump: pg_backup_archiver.c
>
> > Log message:
> > Adjust lo type in contrib during pg_restore so that pg_restore could
> > reload the type.
>
> I find this really ugly, and I do not believe this code belongs in
> pg_dump (nor pg_restore). We are not in the habit of putting kluges
> into pg_dump to adjust system catalog entries for version-to-version
> changes, and I certainly don't think that we should put in such a kluge
> for a type that's only contrib.
>
> The correct way to update contrib/lo for 7.3 is to load the 7.3
> definition into a database before restoring the old definition.
>
> If someone fails to do that, it'd be okay to supply this fix as a script
> in contrib/lo to run against the database after-the-fact. But I object
> to putting it into pg_restore.
Please tell me how we avoid the failure
ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'oid' and 'lo'
You will have to retype this query using an explicit cast
in pg_restore.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/