Re: Two features left
| От | Jean-Luc Lachance |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Two features left |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3DE52FFF.3816036E@nsd.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Two features left (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Two features left
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
My question again is: How can the upper transaction be aware of an aborted lower transaction? JLL Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Right. I hadn't planned on ABORT ALL, but it could be done to abort the > > entire transaction. Is there any standard on that? > > I would be inclined to argue against any such thing; if I'm trying to > confine the effects of an error by doing a subtransaction BEGIN, I don't > think I *want* to allow something inside the subtransaction to abort my > outer transaction ... > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: