Re: [GENERAL] Security implications of (plpgsql) functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Security implications of (plpgsql) functions
Дата
Msg-id 3DB42954.3030209@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Security implications of (plpgsql) functions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Security implications of (plpgsql) functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> A depth limit for PL-function recursion is perhaps feasible, but I can't
> say that I care for it a whole lot ... anyone have better ideas?
> 

Is there any way to recognize infinite recursion by analyzing the saved 
execution tree -- i.e. can we assume that a function that calls itself, with 
the same arguments with which it was called, constitutes infinite recursion?

Joe



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Security implications of (plpgsql) functions
Следующее
От: Olivier PRENANT
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Please help