I don't object. In fact I have never even looked at this code before
now. I doubt anyone else on the jdbc list would mind either, but it
wouldn't hurt to ask.
--Barry
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver.
>>
>
>>It is java, but only tangentially related to the driver.
>
>
> I doubt that either of us are qualified to opine on that point.
> Perhaps you should be asking in pgsql-jdbc whether it's okay to remove
> contrib/retep. If no one there objects, then I won't complain.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>