Re: additional patch for contrib/tablefunc - added to

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>>I think you finally got through my thick skull. Now I see the
>>issue. OK, I'll  rework the patch using a timeout.
>
> I think this is unnecessary.  Bugs in any functionality tested by a
> regression test could cause the system to go into an infinite loop;
> but we don't put timeouts on all of them.  In practice we rely on
> the user to exercise some judgment about whether the tests are
> proceeding normally.

Sounds good to me. I guess the patch stands as originally sent, unless other
objections arise.

Thanks,

Joe