Re: killing process question
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: killing process question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D8A4197.32559.14A47941@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: killing process question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 19 Sep 2002 at 11:49, Tom Lane wrote: > "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> writes: > > I guess a backend should terminate as if connection is closed. What say? > > No. > > It will terminate when it tries to read the next query from the client. OK. But what if it never reads anything? I mean if the client dies after a complete transaction i.e. no input pending for either back end or client, will it just sit around waiting for select to signal that fd?(AFAIU, that's how things goes in there..) Clearly we have a case where backend is hung persumably. Either it has to have an explanation(OK client did aborted abruptly) and/or a possible corrective action.. Just some thoughts.. Bye Shridhar -- QOTD: "I won't say he's untruthful, but his wife has to call the dog for dinner."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: