Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions

Tom Lane wrote:
> The fix actually uses the "expected tuple desc" that's now passed by
> ExecMakeTableFunctionResult as the target descriptor.  This should mean
> that it'd be possible to support plpgsql functions returning RECORD, but
> I didn't have time to look into that.  Anyone want to try?

I haven't really looked too closely at Neil plpgsql stuff, so I'm a bit
concerned with the spin-up time I'd need to figure this out. But if Neil
doesn't show up and volunteer between now and Saturday morning, I'll
take a look.

Joe