Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types
Дата
Msg-id 3D545DB6.6C3FF8A1@fourpalms.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> That's what I was thinking. In cases where you want to use the type for
> several functions, use CREATE TYPE. If you only need the type for one
> function, let the function creation process manage it for you.

It would be nice then to have some mechanism for converting the
"automatic type" to a named type which could be used elsewhere.
Otherwise one would need to garbage collect the separate stuff later,
which would probably go into the "not so convenient" category of
features...
                  - Thomas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Shattuck
Дата:
Сообщение: strange performance anomalies
Следующее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types