Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I prefer 64 for NAMEDATALEN myself.  Standards compliance is nice, but
> realistically it seems a shame to waste so much space on an excessive
> length that will never be used.
> 

But is the space wasted really never more than a few MB's, even if the 
database itself is say 1 GB? If so, and if the speed penalty is small to 
non-existent, I'd rather be spec compliant. That way nobody has a good 
basis for complaining ;-)

I guess I'll try another test with a larger data-set.

Joe