Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka

Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm.  I'd sort of expect the "z" to become both the table and column
> alias in this case.  What do you think?

I guess that would make sense. I'll make a separate patch just for that
change if that's OK.


> Other examples look good.  Code style comment:
>
>
>>+         if (functyptype != 'p' || (functyptype == 'p' && funcrettype != RECORDOID))
>
>
> This test seems redundant, why not
>
>         if (functyptype != 'p' || funcrettype != RECORDOID)
>

You're correct, of course. But I started out with a much more convoluted
test than that, so at least this was an improvement ;-)

Joe