Performance on update from join

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jean-Luc Lachance
Тема Performance on update from join
Дата
Msg-id 3CD94F3C.4B116582@nsd.ca
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на data loss due to improper handling of postmaster ....  ("Rajesh Kumar Mallah." <mallah@trade-india.com>)
Ответы Re: Performance on update from join  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-sql
Hi all,
Hi Tom,

I was exploring ways to improve the time required to update a large
table from the join of two others as in:
UPDATE a FROM b, c;

I found that whatever index I create, compound or not, PG insist on
performing the cartesian product first.
Now, if "b" and "c" are relatively small, that make sense, but when the
cartesian product of "b" and "c" is and order of magnitude larger than
"a" it makes no sense at all.

Shouldn't the number of rows in "b" and "c" be reduced to the matching
the criterias on "a" first?
If "b" is meant to be a many to one relation to "c", shouldn't "a" be
joined to "b" first?

Is there a way I can force the "a" join "b" first?


I also tried to do it in a PLPGSQL FOR LOOP, but because the script is
processed as a transaction, I do not get much better performance.

It would sure be nice to be able to commit the change on a row per row
basis.

THX

jll


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Josh Berkus"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql: question
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgresql 7.1 file descriptor