Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hiroshi Inoue
Тема Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Дата
Msg-id 3CC748A3.22170450@tpf.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Vote on SET in aborted transaction  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction  (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>)
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Right offhand, I am not seeing anything here for which there's a
> compelling case not to roll it back on error.
> 
> In fact, I have yet to hear *any* plausible example of a variable
> that we would really seriously want not to roll back on error.

Honetsly I don't understand what kind of example you
expect. How about the following ?

[The curren schema is schema1]
begin;create schema foo;set search_path = foo;create table t1 (....);.  [error occurs]rollback;insert into t1 select *
fromschema1.t1;
 

Should the search_path be put back in this case ?
As I mentioned already many times, it doesn't seem
*should be* kind of thing.

regards, 
Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hiroshi Inoue
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction