Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

Vote number 1 -- ROLL BACK

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>OK, would people please vote on how to handle SET in an aborted
>transaction?  This vote will allow us to resolve the issue and move
>forward if needed.
>
>In the case of:
>
>    SET x=1;
>    BEGIN;
>    SET x=2;
>    query_that_aborts_transaction;
>    SET x=3;
>    COMMIT;
>
>at the end, should 'x' equal:
>    
>    1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction
>    2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort
>    3 - All SETs are honored in aborted transaction
>    ? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable
>
>Our current behavior is 2.
>
>Please vote and I will tally the results.
>