Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
| От | Michael Loftis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3CBD8584.8040200@wgops.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > >Systems which have optimizing planners can *never* be guaranteed to >generate the actual lowest-cost query plan. Any impression that Oracle, >for example, actually does do that may come from a lack of visibility >into the process, and a lack of forum for discussing these edge cases. > I wholly agree... Oracle has some fairly *sick* ideas at times about what to do in the face of partial ambiguity. (I've got a small set of queries that will drive any machine with PeopleSoft DBs loaded to near catatonia...) :) As far as the 'planner benchmark suite' so we cans tart gathering more statistical data about what costs should be, or are better at, that's an excellent idea.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: