Re: timeout implementation issues

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > Oops does the first mean rolling back the variables on abort ?
> > > > If so I made a mistake. The current is better than the second.
> > >
> > > The second means all SET's are rolled back on abort.
> >
> > I see.
> > BTW what varibles are rolled back on abort currently ?
> 
> Currently, none,

??? What do you mean by   o  Some SETs are honored in an aborted transaction (current)
?
Is the current state different from    o  All SETs are honored in an aborted transaction
?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue