Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3CADDD26.3010404@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>>INSERT INTO t1(bytea_col) VALUES('characters produced by
>>PQescapebytea'::bytea);
>
>
> Probably that would cause the error to disappear, but it's hardly a
> desirable answer.
>
> I wonder whether this says that TEXT is not a good implementation of
> type UNKNOWN. That choice was made on the assumption that TEXT would
> faithfully preserve the contents of a C string ... but it seems that in
> the multibyte world it ain't so. It would not be a huge amount of work
> to write a couple more I/O routines and give UNKNOWN its own I/O
> behavior.
I could take a look at this. Any guidance other than "faithfully
preserving the contents of a C string"?
>
> OTOH, I was surprised to read your message because I had assumed the
> damage was being done much further upstream, viz during collection of
> the query string by pq_getstr(). Do we need to think twice about that
> processing, as well?
I'll take a look at this as well.
Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: