Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I suppose it's a judgment call which is uglier. Thoughts?
>
Well, PUBLIC is an SQL reserved keyword (pre-92). We are
already very liberal with keywords. I would leave PUBLIC alone.
I does not _have_ to be "public", so we can just avoid the issue
by adding a pg_ prefix to public, common or something else.
It is a PostgreSQL concept anyway.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9