On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
> functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
>
> Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
> section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
> of the functions?
No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
--
Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)