Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Igor Kovalenko
Тема Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
Дата
Msg-id 3C9B6DDB.9AEE6D03@motorola.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Ответы Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Does that mean I should redo patch for 7.3 as is, or you guys want it to
go farther this time? The last version had compromises intended to make
changes minimal...

Also, does anyone from Darwin or BeOS camp care? You guys should not be
working through emulation of SysV ugliness. If someone is listening, we
could come up with a version suitable for you too...

-- igor

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> 
> Just remember that patches for 7.3 are being accepted at this very moment...
> 
> Chris
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Igor Kovalenko
> > Sent: Friday, 22 March 2002 1:31 AM
> > To: Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
> > Cc: bruc@acm.org; tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [HACKERS] bad performance on irix
> >
> >
> > No, I've been told it is not gonna be considered for 7.2x and I shall
> > wait till 7.3.
> >
> > Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro wrote:
> > >
> > > > Makes me wonder... perhaps now someone will be convinced to
> > take a look
> > > > at the POSIX IPC patch. On some platforms (not on Linux I am afraid)
> > > > POSIX mutexes might be quite a bit faster than SYSV semaphores.
> > > >
> > > Is there any current patch?
> > > Regards
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL