Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This is not the idiomatic way to do it; there is an equalstr() macro
> in equalfuncs.c that does this pushup for you. So "return
> equalstr(a->val.str, b->val.str)" would be the appropriate fix.
>
Here it is. Thanks again.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9Index: src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.114
diff -c -p -r1.114 equalfuncs.c
*** src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c 2002/03/06 20:34:48 1.114
--- src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c 2002/03/07 15:43:28
*************** _equalValue(Value *a, Value *b)
*** 1771,1777 ****
case T_Float:
case T_String:
case T_BitString:
! return strcmp(a->val.str, b->val.str) == 0;
default:
break;
}
--- 1771,1777 ----
case T_Float:
case T_String:
case T_BitString:
! return equalstr(a->val.str, b->val.str);
default:
break;
}