"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > > Okay, if the ecpg is the only issue, does everyone feel comfortable with a
> > > > branch going in this evening? I'll do a v7.2.1 tar-ball up Sunday night
> > > > based on the branch, with an announce going out on Monday?
> > >
> > > I don't think it's time for 7.2.1 quite yet; we should probably wait
> > > another week or two to see what comes in. I just want to branch now...
> >
> > Agreed. Let's get everything we can into 7.2.1. We normally don't push
> > out a minor this quickly unless we have a major thing to fix, which we
> > don't.
>
> Right, and we never branch until we're ready for the first minor ... so
> ...
Hang on here. It sounds like we're following previous methodology to
our (possible) slight detriment here.
At present, we need 7.3 to start, so that people can begin working on
it.
We also need to have the 7.2 branch, so stuff for the to-be 7.2.x can be
included there where appropriate.
So, lets get it branched, because that's what needs to be done here and
now, in this instance.
Then people with a burn to do 7.3 stuff can do so, and things can be
added to 7.2.x where needed.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi