Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3C4D08CA.1B8EA385@fourpalms.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. While the
> GPL has similar goals, PostgreSQL developers find the restrictions
> imposed by the GPL to be unacceptable. Since the BSD license has no
> such restrictions, we like it and have no intention of changing it.
*I* don't find GPL unacceptable. Some of my favorite software (present
company excepted of course) has it. But I am and have always been
satisfied that the BSD license (predating GPL as Don points out) serves
Postgres and PostgreSQL just fine.
I've always considered it a point of recognition that we retain the
licensing that Berkeley was kind enough to give us. It *is* one of the
great licenses in the history of open software. So why are we having to
justify it?
- Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: