Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

> > > Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> > > earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
> > > grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
> > > having the shift/reduce issues resolved...
...
> CREATE DATABASE <name> WITH LOCATION = <name> WITH OWNER = <name>

It was this syntax I was wondering about. Multiple "WITH"s should not be
necessary. Are they actually required in the patch?

                  - Thomas