Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

> > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > >   perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.

Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
having the shift/reduce issues resolved...

                   - Thomas