Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
| От | Hannu Krosing |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3BFCCA1F.AF32EF7F@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > What bothers me about this is that we have the original page with the > > old data. It would be nice if we could write the new page in a > > different location, make the new page active and recycle the old page at > > some later time. > > I don't see how that reduces the total amount of disk traffic? > > It's also kind of unclear how to do it without doubling (or worse) the > amount of table space used in many common scenarios. I doubt many > people will be happy if "DELETE FROM foo" requires transient space equal > to twice the original size of foo. IIRC the double space requrement is what has kept us from implementing DROP COLUMN. ----------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: