Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3BD75E18.E971F0A3@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? ("Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron@the-infinite.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> > In fact, some could argue that the default behavior of PostgreSQL
> > should be changed (or at least have an option) to behave like
> > Oracle, where a transaction is implicitly begun at the first
> > encounter of an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE - or in PostgreSQL's case, the
> > first submitted statement.
> If we put in an implicit BEGIN at the start of a connection, when
> does it get committed? We certainly dare not do an implicit COMMIT
> when the client disconnects, but without that the change would
> completely break a lot of existing applications.
Ingres solved this with a mode switch; "set autocommit on|off" which is
in the style that we would likely use too. It *should* be optional, but
settable, and we can debate which should be the default later.
When autocommit is "off", the transaction gets committed when you exit
or when you explicitly commit.
- Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: