Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit
Дата
Msg-id 3BD3B3EE.CD7B22D1@fourpalms.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > > I am confused.  While LIMIT and OFFSET may are potential SQL standard
> > > reserved words, I don't see how LIMIT #,# would ever be a standard
> > > specification.  Do you see this somewhere I am missing.  Again, LIMIT
> > > #,# is the only syntax we are removing.
> > If you are confident that LIMIT #,# would never be an official SQL
> > standard who am I to second guess that ;) I don't see that possibility
> > anywhere either, but I just wanted to make sure. The possibility that it
> > might become an official standard is the only objection I had against
> > deprecating and eventual elimination of that syntax.
> > LIMIT # OFFSET # has my vote.
> OK, we have received only one vote to keep LIMIT #,# working for one
> more release, and several to remove it so I am committing a patch now to
> remove LIMIT #,# and instead have them use LIMIT # OFFSET #:

I've cc'd this to the hackers list. I know the discussion started on
general, but if I hadn't been subscribed to *that* list I'd have never
known about any of this. And noone else on hackers would either.
                   - Thomas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Creating unique constraints on OID
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Error while restoring database