Re: Re: List response time...
| От | David Ford |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: List response time... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3B85EF3D.90108@blue-labs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | List response time... ("Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho@alcor.concordia.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: List response time...
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>Mailing lists don't scale well to large numbers of subscribers. I see this >>delay constantly,on multiple lists. The bigger the list gets, the slower the >>list gets (and the more loaded the server gets, right Marc? :-)). >> > >Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail. >In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much >better choice to handle large mailing lists. When we switched from >sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or >sometimes even days, to seconds. > It's all in the configuration. I slam mails around dozens of machines in seconds using sendmail and I process a lot of mail. David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: