Re: Still wondering about random numbers...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От gateley@jriver.com
Тема Re: Still wondering about random numbers...
Дата
Msg-id 3B701A40.B0EC1685@jriver.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Still wondering about random numbers...  ("Dr. Evil" <drevil@sidereal.kz>)
Список pgsql-general
Joe Conway wrote:
>
> > I am running on OpenBSD and Linux, both of which have
> > cryptographic-quality RNGs built in.  When I call RANDOM() in PG, do I
> > get the old C library random numbers, which are not very random, or do
> > I get high-quality random numbers from the crypto-RNG that's built in?
> > Any sugestions for getting high-quality random numbers?
>
> Looking through the source, I find:
>  result = ((double) random()) / ((double) MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);

The random() function returns better (good?)
random numbers. The rand() function returns poor
random numbers. random() also depends on how
much state it is initialized with (and may or may
not be based on /dev/random, I don't know).

j

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Still wondering about random numbers...
Следующее
От: "Eric, Audet"
Дата:
Сообщение: Admin tool