Re: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal

mlw wrote:
> 
> I posted this question earlier, but it looks like it never made it on.
> 
> If you can control the OIDs on a per table basis, and some tables need not even
> have any, why not let each table have its own OID range? Essentially, each
> record will be numbered relative to 0 on its table?
> 
> That would really cut down the OID wrap around problem, and allow records to
> have a notion of serialization.
What would the meaning of such an "OID" be ?

Apart from duplicating the primary key that is ?

------------------
Hannu