Re: Partial Indices vs. mixing columns and functions
| От | Hiroshi Inoue |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Partial Indices vs. mixing columns and functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3B539A64.6FF9106@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Partial Indices vs. mixing columns and functions (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Partial Indices vs. mixing columns and functions
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > What kind of expression is allowed as the predicate now ? > > Anything that doesn't involve an aggregate or a subselect. > > (But what the planner can recognize as matching a query's > WHERE clause is currently much more restricted, just ANDs > and ORs of simple VAR OP CONST clauses. This could be > improved in the future.) > > > Both the functions used in functional indexes and the > > predicates used in partial indexes must be deterministic. > > Are users responsible for it ? > > Yes. I don't see how the system could enforce that, without > prohibiting lots of useful cases. > Shouldn't the functions be *cacheable* at least ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: