Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier
| От | Thomas Swan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3B41DF2E.9000803@ics.olemiss.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Where can I find some more information on it? I'm curious now.<br /><br /> Alex Pilosov wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid:Pine.BSO.4.10.10107022230120.7004-100000@spider.pilosoft.com"type="cite"><pre wrap="">On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, ThomasSwan wrote:<br /><br /></pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">I sit corrected. <br /><br />*slightly humbled*<br/><br />Why not do an unsigned int16 to hold your UUID generated numbers. <br /></pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">Nota good idea, since rules for comparison of UUID are wierd and are<br />_definitely_ not same as for comparisonof int16.<br /><br /></pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Ultimately, this would seem to be a more generalsolution and accomplish <br />your goals at the sametime. Or, am I completely missing something.<br /></pre></blockquote><prewrap=""><br /><br />---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------<br/>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command<br /> (send"unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org">majordomo@postgresql.org</a>)<br/></pre></blockquote><br /><br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: