Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
От | MauMau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3B3968D184E74416962BA7EB9ECB2510@maumau обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Greg Stark" <stark@mit.edu> > On the client end the FATAL is pretty logical but in the logs it makes > it sound like the entire server died. Especially in this day of > multithreaded servers. I was suggesting that that was the origin of > the confusion here. Anyone who has seen these messages on the client > end many times might interpret them correctly in the server logs but > someone who has only been a DBA, not a database user might never have > seen them except in the server logs and without the context might not > realize that FATAL is a term of art peculiar to Postgres. I think so, too. My customers and colleagues, who are relatively new to PostgreSQL, asked like "Is this FATAL message a sign of some problem? What does it mean?" I think it's natural to show concern when finding FATAL messages. I find it unnatural for a normal administration operation to emit a FATAL message. Regards MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: