from the docs, i know that if you have two tables, foo and bar, you can
write a query such as
select f.bling
from foo f
where f.id = (select max( b.id )from bar bwhere b.bling = "i kiss you!"
);
what i'm wondering is if you need that subquery in two places in a query
if there's some way to cache it at the top level.
for instance, if i were shooting for
select f.id
from foo f, ola o
where f.id = (select max( b.id )from bar bwhere b.bling = "i kiss you!"
)
and o.id != (select max( b.id )from bar bwhere b.bling = "i kiss you!"
)
is there some way to grab the value returned by the subquery in the
superquery and use the value instead of running the subquery twice?
i'm not looking for an optimized version of my example (unless it
answers the question of the bigger picture); i'd rather know if there's
some way to access top-level aggregates from within a subquery.
or find out that postgres is smart enough to recognize bits of SQL in a
query that are identical and do its own internal caching.
generically stated, my question is:
is there some way, without writing a function, to calculate an aggregate
value in a query that is used in multiple subqueries without needing to
run an aggregating query multiple times?
i know it only amounts to syntactic sugar, but, as such, it would be
pretty sweet.
thanks.
-tfo