Hi guys,
Which of these patch is "better"? I'd like to include this this on the
techdocs.postgresql.org website with a patch for it.
Just have to know which one to include.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Glen Eustace wrote:
>
> > I have just upgraded to the new DBD, but am still using postgresql 7.0.3
> >
> > I am now getting access errors. I have had to go back into the db and
> > GRANT ALL on <ALL> to PUBLIC as a work around.
> >
> > Even though I have specified a userid and password on the DBI->connect,
> > Pg seems to be using the actual user.
> >
> > NB: I didn't change any of my code, just upgraded to DBD 0.96, I have
> > since upgraded to DBI 1.15 but that hasn't helped.
>
> There's a bug in Pg::DBD 0.96. Here's the patch:
>
> *** DBD-Pg-0.96/Pg.pm-orig Tue Apr 10 03:44:18 2001
> --- DBD-Pg-0.96/Pg.pm Sun Apr 15 10:26:16 2001
> ***************
> *** 79,89 ****
> $Name =~ s/^.*dbname\s*=\s*//;
> $Name =~ s/\s*;.*$//;
>
> ! $user = "" unless defined($user);
> ! $auth = "" unless defined($auth);
> !
> ! $user = $ENV{DBI_USER} unless $user eq "";
> ! $auth = $ENV{DBI_PASS} unless $auth eq "";
>
> my($dbh) = DBI::_new_dbh($drh, {
> 'Name' => $Name,
> --- 79,88 ----
> $Name =~ s/^.*dbname\s*=\s*//;
> $Name =~ s/\s*;.*$//;
>
> ! $user ||= $ENV{DBI_USER};
> ! $auth ||= $ENV{DBI_PASS};
> ! $user ||= "";
> ! $auth ||= "";
>
> my($dbh) = DBI::_new_dbh($drh, {
> 'Name' => $Name,
>
> http://www.chapelperilous.net/btfwk/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> It's amazing how many people you could be friends with if only they'd
> make the first approach.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi