Re: Unsigned int functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: Unsigned int functions
Дата
Msg-id 3AC424FB.33264C61@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Unsigned int functions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> If general opinion is that unsigned types should not be part of
> postgres, I'll have to look at turning them into a contrib type. Please
> let me know.

Providing them as a contrib/ package will allow you to provide the
*full* complement of cross-type conversion and operator functions
without worrying about bloat. Tom Lane has shown how to use entry points
on shared libraries to start us thinking about how to provide better
package integration, which should allow us to reduce the distinction
between contrib/ and standard features.

This would be a great package to develop these additional package
support features for 7.2 (hint hint ;)
                      - Thomas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [SQL] possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Error in the date field (with NULL value...).Thanks!