Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
| От | William K. Volkman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3AB2B773.9119E73@hiscorp.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re[4]: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote: >> > But, with shared libraries, are you really pulling in a "whole > thread-support library"? My understanding of shared libraries (altho it > may be totally off) was that instead of pulling in a whole library, you > pulled in the bits that you needed, pretty much as you needed them ... Just by making a thread call libc changes personality to use thread safe routines (I.E. add mutex locking). Use one thread feature, get the whole set...which may not be that bad. -- William K. Volkman. CIO - H.I.S. Financial Services Corporation. 102 S. Tejon, Ste. 920, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 Phone: 719-633-6942 Fax: 719-633-7006 Cell: 719-330-8423
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: