Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> > So, it's better to leave archdir in pg_control now - if we'll
> > decide that GUC is better place then we'll just ignore archdir
> > in pg_control. But if it will be better to have it in pg_control
> > then we'll not be able to add it there.
> 
> But what possible reason is there for keeping it in pg_control?
> AFAICS that would just mean that we'd need special code for setting it,
> instead of making use of all of Peter's hard work on GUC.
>

I don't think it's appropriate to edit archdir by hand.

Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue