Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joseph Shraibman
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Дата
Msg-id 3A6F5668.3C7443F7@selectacast.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> No, it cannot be static.
>

Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
used directly.  It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them.  But the
performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
the code, so I don't suggest it.


--
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems