"Robert B. Easter" wrote:
>
> Is UNDER being stripped out for 7.1? I'm looking at documentation and don't
> want to write about it if it won't be in there.
Thats' how I understand the outcome of a discussion about 1 week ago
here:
Tom Lane wrote on Tue Jan 2 20:19:18 2001:
> Anyway, we seem to have a clear consensus to pull the UNDER clause from
> the grammar and stick with INHERITS for 7.1. I will take care of that
> in the next day or so.
------------------
Hannu