Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hiroshi Inoue
Тема Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
Дата
Msg-id 3A557DEB.36D789AB@tpf.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I just finished running the parallel regress tests with inval.c rigged
> to flush the relcache and syscache at every available opportunity,
> that is anytime we could recognize a shared-cache-inval message from
> another backend (see diff below).  This setup gives a whole new universe
> of meaning to the word "slow" --- it took *three full days* to run the
> standard "make check" procedure, including eighteen hours just to do the
> "vacuum template1" part of initdb.  I kid you not.  But it worked.
> Looks like the unexpected-cache-entry-drop class of problems are indeed
> gone.
> 

Great.
Thanks.

Hiroshi Inoue


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: time + date_part oddness?
Следующее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing ColLabel tokens