Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
| От | mlw |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3A3193DA.11E7C960@mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? (Andrew Snow <als@fl.net.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Snow wrote: > > Could you perhaps post the code you have for splitting a text field up into > keys, then I could work on turning into a new type of index with a new > operator, as Tom suggested? > > (Or is this already what the text search code in contrib already does??) Go to a search engine like lycos, alltheweb, or altavista. This is the type of search capability I want to use in Postgres. I have it working as a stand-alone daemon, it is fast and produces very relevant results. I just thought that this sort of functionality would be a big plus if I could tie it down deep in Postgres. The big advantage to the code is high relevance, boolean operations, and very very high speed operation. If I could get easy Postgres record selection out of it, it would rock. -- http://www.mohawksoft.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: