Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Lamar Owen
Тема Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Дата
Msg-id 39FEF55E.8BE4A3A7@wgcr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Список pgsql-ports
Karl DeBisschop wrote:
>
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > As to why the package is split, well, it is highly useful to many people
> > to have a PostgreSQL _client_ installation that accesses a central
> > database server -- there is no need to have a postmaster and a full
> > backend when all you need is psql and the libraries and documentation
> > that goes along with psql.
>
> My personal experience is that the way the PostgreSQL RPMs are split is very good. It meshes nicely with other
dependenciesso that I don't need to install extra RPMs on our servers. I for one would not like to see that change. 

And I agree -- and have no plans to change.  If anything the RPMset will
increase in number, not decrease.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karl DeBisschop
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Следующее
От: Scott Ribe
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql on Mac OS X?