Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karl DeBisschop
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Дата
Msg-id 39FEF32A.AD89D766@alert.infoplease.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Список pgsql-ports
Lamar Owen wrote:

> As to why the package is split, well, it is highly useful to many people
> to have a PostgreSQL _client_ installation that accesses a central
> database server -- there is no need to have a postmaster and a full
> backend when all you need is psql and the libraries and documentation
> that goes along with psql.

My personal experience is that the way the PostgreSQL RPMs are split is very good. It meshes nicely with other
dependenciesso that I don't need to install extra RPMs on our servers. I for one would not like to see that change.   

--
Karl DeBisschop                        kdebisschop@alert.infoplease.com
Learning Network Reference             http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer              kdebisschop@users.sourceforge.net

В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Chandra Sekhar . K"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problem in installation of PostgreSQL 7.0.2
Следующее
От: Lamar Owen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)