Re: WAL status update

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hiroshi Inoue
Тема Re: WAL status update
Дата
Msg-id 39FCF2E8.F6B6A0EA@tpf.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers

Vadim Mikheev wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> First, as I've already mentioned in answer to Tom about DROP TABLE, undo
> logic
> will not be implemented in 7.1 -:( Doable for tables but for indices we
> would need
> either in compensation records or in xmin/cmin in index tuples. So, we'll
> still live
> with dust from aborted xactions in our tables/indices.
>

Does it mean that there would still be inconsistency between
tables and their indexes ?

Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Larry Rosenman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: another try
Следующее
От: "Rob S."
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: another try